If we fail to engage….
Debate, discourse, discussion, conversation, banter, talk, describe
the diverse ways civil society communicates. In spite of the proliferation of
digital communication, we seem to be losing the ability to communicate on a
personal level. With information, entertainment and communication at our
fingertips, our ability to reach out and connect with each other should improve.
Unfortunately, texting, Twitter, Snapchatting, and the like has caused our
dialogue to devolve into short snipes that often are inappropriate and vulgar.
We use social media to debase people we don’t even know. Not having to face one
another, enables one to say things that would never be said in person.
It has become so easy to simply fire off invectives at those
in which you disagree when one can simply communicate through the ethernet. Why
take the time to actually converse with someone when you can simply send a text
message. Sit down and properly discuss issues and understand opposing
viewpoints, not so much? Case in point; Seems that some of my Op-eds have
generated considerable consternation from those who disagree. Anonymous voice
mails describing me as a “f-bombing” hypocrite, derogatory comments in letters
to the Editor and op-eds disparaging me as a partisan hack. Name calling is the
last refuge of those who cannot logically disprove an opposing point of view. This
type of discourse is exactly why our society has been so wracked with hatred
toward those that fail to share a common opinion.
In a scene from Cool Hand Luke, starring Paul Newman, the
captain of the guard, played by Strother Martin decries, “What we have here is
a failure to communicate.” Newman is a convict on a chain gang that continually
fails to obey the orders of the prison staff, prompting this response as he
receives punishment for his disobedience. Our society has developed an even
greater breakdown in our ability to communicate. Back in the day, politicians
of both parties could disagree during debate in the halls of government, yet
still be friends. That is becoming a thing of the past as one’s political
leanings are all important, overtaking the responsibility to properly serve one’s
constituency. In other words, fealty to Party before service to the people they
represent.
As our public discourse devolves into bytes of criticism and
attacks, we run the risk of losing our civil society altogether. We become
tribal, believing those in which we disagree are our enemies. A nation that
squabbles among themselves opens opportunities for our world competitors and adversaries
to take advantage. When we fail to openly debate and respect each other’s
opinion, we further devolve into self-centered, everyone for themselves people,
and all suffer equally. When we spend so much capital vilifying those with
which we disagree, we tear apart the fabric that weaves civil society together.
We need to recapture the ability to listen and fight the urge to shut down
debate. Institutions of higher education need to return to being the centers of
open inquiry and vibrant debate. We need to return to treating others as you
would want and expect them to treat you.
Social media and the numerous news media outlets continue to
preach division and distrust of your fellow citizens. Hollywood uses their
bully pulpit to promote their values and morals that the majority of this nation
rejects. A society thrives upon mutual respect, not blind allegiance to any
political ideology. A society thrives with a vigorous exchange of ideas and
viewpoints. A society thrives when we learn to embrace our faults, our
differences and work together to enhance the quality of life for everyone. A
society that cannot engage in reasonable dialogue is doomed to failure. We had
better learn to live with each other before this nation ceases to exist. If you
can’t convince yourself to love your neighbors, at least try to tolerate them. “On
the contrary: If your enemy is hungry, feed him. If he is thirsty, give him
something to drink. In doing this, it will be as if you are placing burning
coals upon his head.” Follow this example and it just may be easier to have
that cordial conversation with someone from the other side of the aisle.
No comments:
Post a Comment